An Epiphany Strikes Late In The Game
Nov. 11th, 2005 09:04 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been posting chapters of my novel, "Old Blood's Fate," on the workshop. One of the nice things about being on OWW is you can, if you are lucky and willing to work hard in return, develop relationships with people who will tell you the truth about your work, and point you in the right direction. I've managed to collect several reviews from people whose opinions I trust.
(
allochthon,
ccfinlay,
dlandon,
everyonesakitty,
jmeadows,
matociquala,
merebrillante,
navicat, and
sosostris2012, I'm looking at you guys. Thanks for all the help!)
After reading the reviews by these very smart people, I think we have unearthed the main problem I'm having with this piece.
I'm rushing things. I'm not giving enough grounding details. I'm not using the really juicy verbs that can punch up a descriptive scene. I've had several reviewers tell me many of the same things: that the scenes are a little too frantic, that I could flesh out people and places more. That they need more information and description than I am giving them. That I'm rushing the story at a faster pace than it needs.
(Lest everyone think it is all first novel doom and gloom, there have also been some very positive things said about it. Most everyone thinks my main protagonist is a strong and likeable character, the villains are sympathetic, the blended mythology is working, and the dialogue is natural and flows well. So yes, there are things working, and they are things that I did nearly two years ago, when I was at a different skill level.)
I was looking over the reviews everyone left and wondering how in the hell I was going to fix this. The stupid thing is already almost 130,000 words long.
And it hit me (well, actually what
ccfinlay said hit me): I'm writing a novel, but I'm thinking like a short story writer. I'm use to shoving eight pounds worth of story into a five pound bag, but what I have is three ten pound bags waiting to be filled.
*facepalm*
I've been approaching the piece from the wrong angle. I've been using the wrong storytelling technique the whole time!
I've been trying to cram everything into a single novel, because I've spent the last few years practicing the art of cramming everything into a single story. But a novel is a completely different type of storytelling. I've been trying to write this piece like it's an overgrown short story, but that's not what a novel is. And even though I already knew this, I did it anyway. A little part of my brain kept trying to tell me that, if the story was too big for one novel (which, if I go back and do it right, it obviously is), then it's okay to make it two or three novels. I, however, ruthlessly muzzled that little voice in my determination to get it all down in one book.
Why? Because I was thinking like a short story writer, not a novelist.
*headdesk*
Stupid writer! No biscuit for you!
I don't have one 130,000 word novel: I have the framework for two 90,000 word novels, or three 75,000 word novels. Now I know what to do. I have the skeleton and most of the internal organs in place, but I need to add muscle and skin to this tale.
Thank you, my wonderful reviewers and crit buddies. You've pointed me the right direction.
Back to work.
In Peace
Michael
(
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
After reading the reviews by these very smart people, I think we have unearthed the main problem I'm having with this piece.
I'm rushing things. I'm not giving enough grounding details. I'm not using the really juicy verbs that can punch up a descriptive scene. I've had several reviewers tell me many of the same things: that the scenes are a little too frantic, that I could flesh out people and places more. That they need more information and description than I am giving them. That I'm rushing the story at a faster pace than it needs.
(Lest everyone think it is all first novel doom and gloom, there have also been some very positive things said about it. Most everyone thinks my main protagonist is a strong and likeable character, the villains are sympathetic, the blended mythology is working, and the dialogue is natural and flows well. So yes, there are things working, and they are things that I did nearly two years ago, when I was at a different skill level.)
I was looking over the reviews everyone left and wondering how in the hell I was going to fix this. The stupid thing is already almost 130,000 words long.
And it hit me (well, actually what
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
*facepalm*
I've been approaching the piece from the wrong angle. I've been using the wrong storytelling technique the whole time!
I've been trying to cram everything into a single novel, because I've spent the last few years practicing the art of cramming everything into a single story. But a novel is a completely different type of storytelling. I've been trying to write this piece like it's an overgrown short story, but that's not what a novel is. And even though I already knew this, I did it anyway. A little part of my brain kept trying to tell me that, if the story was too big for one novel (which, if I go back and do it right, it obviously is), then it's okay to make it two or three novels. I, however, ruthlessly muzzled that little voice in my determination to get it all down in one book.
Why? Because I was thinking like a short story writer, not a novelist.
*headdesk*
Stupid writer! No biscuit for you!
I don't have one 130,000 word novel: I have the framework for two 90,000 word novels, or three 75,000 word novels. Now I know what to do. I have the skeleton and most of the internal organs in place, but I need to add muscle and skin to this tale.
Thank you, my wonderful reviewers and crit buddies. You've pointed me the right direction.
Back to work.
In Peace
Michael
no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 03:30 pm (UTC)But your observation that there's too much story to tell in one novel is, I think, the key to telling all the stories you're wanting to tell about this world. I'm so glad you had this epiphany.
Oh, and I still remember the comment about English as a second language. I went back and looked at that review, and I think that comment was directed more at the number of typos in your story than to your writing ability.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 04:14 pm (UTC)If I didn't have a 15 page paper to write for class, I'd jump into rewrites right now!
I was not angry at the person who made the ESL comment; I was angry at myself for basically walking out the door without my pants on, as it were. I've just looked at the manuscript for so long, my eyes slide over stuff sometimes. That is why I don't actually submit anything until
no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 03:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 03:53 pm (UTC)Excelsior!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 09:15 pm (UTC)please?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 06:33 pm (UTC)ONWARD!!!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-11 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-12 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-12 08:21 pm (UTC)