Entry tags:
Set Call For Mr. Eastwood. Will Mr. Eastwood Please Report To The Set.
The Good:
I think I'm starting to get a handle on the problems I've been having. File it under "The more I learn about writing, the more I discover that I know practically nothing about writing." Thanks to everyone who helped me hash out what was wrong. Now comes the hard part: putting all the new stuff I've figured out into practice.
The Bad:
The next reviewer/critter/reader/person waiting for a bus to Poughkeepsie who says: "You should not write in first person because first-person sounds pretentious and off-putting and no editors like first person and it is too hard to write in and besides third-person is industry standard so you need to change this story to third person right now!" is going to get their spleen removed with a dull spork.
I'm just sayin'.
If you've got a legitimate reason why you think I should change from first to third person, then fine, explain it to me and we can talk. But don't send me a review/crit telling me to switch just because. I realize most editors and readers prefer third person, and I'm well aware that third is easier to write in, despite appearances to the contrary. If I chose first-person I have a perfectly good reason.
The Ugly:
I'm really racking up the rejections this month. I'm well into double digits and there's still a whole week left. Urg. This is the danger of having several stories out on submission. Sometimes they all get rejected at once.
There will be more content later today or tomorrow, including my thoughts on the latest Twin Cities Speculative Fiction Writers Network meeting, sleeping in a new bed, and moving.
In Peace
Michael
I think I'm starting to get a handle on the problems I've been having. File it under "The more I learn about writing, the more I discover that I know practically nothing about writing." Thanks to everyone who helped me hash out what was wrong. Now comes the hard part: putting all the new stuff I've figured out into practice.
The Bad:
The next reviewer/critter/reader/person waiting for a bus to Poughkeepsie who says: "You should not write in first person because first-person sounds pretentious and off-putting and no editors like first person and it is too hard to write in and besides third-person is industry standard so you need to change this story to third person right now!" is going to get their spleen removed with a dull spork.
I'm just sayin'.
If you've got a legitimate reason why you think I should change from first to third person, then fine, explain it to me and we can talk. But don't send me a review/crit telling me to switch just because. I realize most editors and readers prefer third person, and I'm well aware that third is easier to write in, despite appearances to the contrary. If I chose first-person I have a perfectly good reason.
The Ugly:
I'm really racking up the rejections this month. I'm well into double digits and there's still a whole week left. Urg. This is the danger of having several stories out on submission. Sometimes they all get rejected at once.
There will be more content later today or tomorrow, including my thoughts on the latest Twin Cities Speculative Fiction Writers Network meeting, sleeping in a new bed, and moving.
In Peace
Michael
no subject
Ignore them. All real readers and editors care about is that the story is good and the pov done well.
Someday, before I die, I'll figure out why people make up rules like this.
no subject
no subject
In writing, there are no rules, only tools.
Tools. Ditch them at your peril.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm a lifetime reader, sadly most of it not literature. A lot of mainstream and mystery besides SF/F. But I hadn't connected the dots as far as 1st person being uncommon in SF/F, especially when it is quite common in mystery. My reaction to the above comments was: "What exactly do you people read?"
PoV is one of my biggest struggles with writing. It's the one area where extensive reading has probably clouded it for me. I feel I've come a long way as far as writing 3rd person close PoV, but I've lost (if I had it) the ability to write acceptable 3rd person omniscient. (Which also gets knocked to hell and back.) But rather than knock a PoV choice, it would be nice to get some ideas on how to make it succeed.
I do think that a critiquer means well when confessing a prejudice at the start of a crit. I've done it myself as far as present tense stories go. However, I'm becoming a lot more accustomed to it so it doesn't hit me in the face anymore. But I do tend to be put off by it, which is why I tell the writer that--I'm not saying don't do it, just admitting I don't care for it. A big "however" here: When present tense works in a story, I don't even notice it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
There are countless examples of successful novels told in first person--including "To Kill a Mockingbird," arguably one of the finest American novels of all time. In our own genre, Roger Zelazny's "Chronicles of Amber" series and Laurel Hamilton's "Anita Blake, Vampire Killer" series are in first person, as is much of John Varley's brilliant short fiction and all of Spider Robinson's Callahan's Crosstime Saloon stories.
Stephen King doesn't use it a lot, I notice, but his form of third-person narration is so intimate and gets us so deep into characters' heads/thoughts that it feels like first person anyway.
no subject
no subject
Basically I think what happened is someone told that person to not use first person because they sucked at it, and they interpreted this to mean that nobody should ever use first person because they sucked at it.
no subject
no subject
And I will join in the spleen-removing, too. Crits like that just get my hair up.
no subject
no subject
no subject
*cries cuz is a horrible critter and obviously took too long to get to your story*
Rejections can be hard, but I have a LOT of faith in you. They will become acceptances soon, don't you worry. At the moment all I'm getting is silence :(
no subject
You're not a horrible critter and frankly, the story had so many flaws it would have been a waste of your time to crit it. I need to work on it more, then I will repost it.
no subject
*watches inbox*